|
OUR MISSION
We will be unrelenting in the pursuit of safety for
children exposed to the extreme dangers of drug abuse environments.
We will facilitate collaborative efforts across all
government and private organizations to:
Prevent drug abuse;
Provide response resources to children when
prevention fails; and
Aggressively break the cycles of drug abuse.
We will be steadfast in our dedication to the
mission and core values of DEC to ensure the concepts become
institutionalized.
NEW: Resource information relating to
California Senate Bill 484
(proposing to return pseudoephedrine to prescription-only)
A. Resource Notebook
(provided to the California State Assembly Public Safety Committee)
* Cover (PDF) (43kb)
* Index (PDF) (289kb)
* Addition:
Letter from US
Senator Diane Feinstein (PDF) (43kb)
* Addition:
Letter from Alex
Stalcup, MD (PDF) (289kb)
* Notebook pocket:
Brochure (PDF) (184kb)
Tab 1 - Written Testimony and PowerPoint Presentation:
* Written
Testimony (PDF) (42kb)
* Memo to Committee
Staff (PDF) (545kb)
* PowerPoint
Presentation (PDF) (1.2mb)
Tab 2 - Electronic monitoring is
not the answer:
* Report on pseudoephedrine smurfing in California
(NDIC)
(PDF) (561kb)
Tab 3 - Electronic monitoring is
not the answer:
*
Letter from
LA IMPACT (PDF) (1.6mb)
Tab 4 - Electronic monitoring is
not the answer:
*
Letter from
Kentucky (LCADTF) (PDF) (11kb)
*
Letter from
Kentucky State Police (PDF) (56kb)
*
Kentucky
Meth Lab Incident Statistics (PDF) (10kb)
Tab 5 - Electronic monitoring is
not the answer:
* Letter from
Arkansas (PDF) (50kb)
Tab 6 - Electronic monitoring is
not the answer:
*
Letter from
Missouri (PDF) (102kb)
Tab 7 - Prescription-only is the
solution:
* Letter from the
Oregon State Pharmacy Association (PDF) (22kb)
Tab 8 - Prescription-only is the
solution:
* Letter from the
Oregon emergency room physicians (PDF) (36kb)
Tab 9 - Prescription-only is the
solution:
* Letter from
the Oregon Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (PDF) (33kb)
Tab 10 - Prescription-only is the
solution:
* Letter from the
California Alliance for Drug Endangered Children (PDF) (280kb)
Tab 11 - Prescription-only is the
solution:
*
Oregon Meth Lab
Incident Statistics (PDF) (163kb)
Tab 12 - Response to CHPA ads and
petition:
* Memo
responding to CHPA ads and petition (PDF) (207kb)
* Letter from the
State of Oregon re Medicaid costs (PDF) (266kb)
Tab 13 - Additional Information:
* Memo to CA BNE
regarding pseudoephedrine prices (PDF) (21kb)
Tab 14 - Additional Information:
* Letter to CA AG
Jerry Brown from the Drug Czar (PDF) (331kb)
Tab 15 - Additional Information:
* Law
Review Article (PDF) (454kb)
B.
Senate Bill 484 documents:
* Senate Bill 484 (PDF) (176kb)
*
Info (Wright) (PDF) (284kb)
*
Staff
analysis (Assembly Public Safety) (PDF) (435kb)
*
Fiscal
analysis (Senate Appropriations) (PDF) (1.0mb)
*
Savings
analysis (BNE) (PDF) (109kb)
C. Notes:
1. Oklahoma and Oregon:
In 2004, Oklahoma and Oregon were the first two states to
effectively control pseudoephedrine and reduce meth lab incidents. Oklahoma was the first to
move pseudoephedrine behind the counter, followed by Oregon.
Eventually, the two states went separate directions to control smurfing
of pseudoephedrine.
Oklahoma limits pseudoephedrine sales to pharmacies only, and has a
fully integrated electronic monitoring stop sale system. Oregon
moved pseudoephedrine to prescription-only. Oklahoma finished 2008
with 213 total meth lab incidents, up from 148 in 2007. That meth
lab resurgence in Oklahoma is continuing: Oklahoma had 258 meth lab
incidents during the first 5 months of 2009. Even with pseudoephedrine sales limited to pharmacies only and with a fully
integrated electronic monitoring stop sale system, Oklahoma had more
meth lab incidents in the month of May of 2009 (64) than Oregon had over
the entire last three years combined (61). See updated
Oregon Meth Lab
Incident Statistics (PDF) (163kb)
2. Mexico has banned pseudoephedrine:
Mexico and five other nations
have now banned pseudoephedrine entirely. Pseudoephedrine is the key
ingredient necessary to make meth (d-methamphetamine). As a
result, California is experiencing a resurgence of small user meths labs
and a resurgence of "super labs" run by drug trafficking organizations.
This is very bad news for California public safety, the environment and,
most tragically, drug endangered children. California is also
again a source state for meth. Current California meth labs,
including the "super labs," are being fed by the smurfing of
pseudoephedrine.
See the
Situation Report (PDF) (561kb)
entitled "Pseudoephedrine Smurfing Fuels Surge in Large-Scale
Methamphetamine Production in California" just released by the National
Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC) in June of 2009.
3. Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM)
Program report:
From the recently released Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program
report:
a. From the Executive Summary: "In Sacramento the proportion of
arrestees involved in acquiring methamphetamine in the prior 30 days
remains high (26%), unchanged from 2007, but in Portland reported
acquisition is significantly lower (13%) than 2007 levels (23%)."
b. From the Conclusion: "Methamphetamine remains largely a regional
phenomenon in this population and declines significantly in one of the
ADAM II western sites (Portland) from 2007 (20% positive) to 2008 (15%
positive). Thirty five percent of Sacramento arrestees test positive in
2008, representing no statistically significant change from 2007."
c. The full report can be found here:
Adam II Report (PDF) (2.85mb)
See also
Oregon
drug arrest trends (PDF) (378kb)
4. Status of California Senate Bill 484:
*
On April 28, 2009, California Senate Bill
484 passed the Senate Public Safety Committee by a vote of 6 to 1.
* On May 28, 2009, the bill passed the Senate Appropriations Committee by
a vote of 7 to 5 (the bill would save the California State budget
millions of dollars in meth lab cleanup and prison costs).
* On June
2, 2009, the bill passed the Senate by a vote of 22 to 10.
* NEW: On June 30, 2009, the bill was heard in the Assembly
Public Safety Committee: 3 members voted for the bill; 2 members voted
against the bill; but 2 members did not vote on the bill, thus the bill
failed for lack of 4 votes in favor of the bill. The bill is now
subject to reconsideration for one week. In the meantime, the
Committee members are awaiting details and a proposed legislative
"alternative" offered by the opponents, namely an electronic tracking
system.
What
is DEC?
Membership
State
and Federal Legislation
Oregon Meth Lab Stats
and Notes
Local
DEC Protocol
Documents
Training
Links
|